What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

"His Writers and His Lecturers Made a Fool of Him" (How Not to Understand Afghanistan)

November 28, 2009, 6:24 AM

Graham Greene's The Quiet American and Antonio Giustozzi's Decoding the New Taliban — two books that I've started more or less simultaneously — are jostling in my brain. In the very first sentence of his introduction, Giustozzi writes words that might have come from one of the characters in Greene's novel of 1950s Vietnam: "perhaps the folly of our age could be identified as an unmatched ambition to change the world, without even bothering to study it in detail and understand it first."

Two men dedicated to "bothering to study" our world recommended these books I'm reading. In this summer's World Affairs, Boston University's Prof. Andrew Bacevich wrote, "For those today seeking to understand how the United States blundered so badly in Iraq and Afghanistan, The Quiet American remains an essential text." On his blog, Steve Coll of The New Yorker called Decoding the New Taliban "as up-to-date as scholarship can be."

As such, I find myself wondering whether it's the sort of book that could have ended up alongside "The Advance of Red China, The Challenge to Democracy, The Role of the West" on the bookshelf of Pyle, Greene's quiet American. Probably not. Decoding the New Taliban, with its 15 contributors, can't speak in the type of facile, certain voice Pyle finds so magnetic. Consider this outburst about Pyle by Greene's narrator:

Suddenly, I was angry; I was tired of the whole pack of them with their private stores of Coca-Cola and their portable hospitals and their too wide cars and their not quite latest guns. I said, 'Yes. They killed him because he was too innocent to live. He was young and ignorant and silly and he got involved. He had no more notion than any of you what the whole affair's about, and you gave him money and York Harding's books on the East and said, "Go ahead. Win the East for democracy." He never saw anything he hadn't heard in a lecture-hall, and his writers and his lecturers made a fool of him. When he saw a dead body he couldn't even see the wounds. A Red menace, a soldier of democracy.'

So, as I go forward with the promising Giustozzi book, I will try not to make a Pyle of myself. I will try to embrace Giustozzi's assessment that scholars "need sometimes to be humble enough to recognize that their theories are not sufficiently refined or informed by empirical material and be patient. Understanding the Taliban is still very much work in progress."


"His Writers and His Lectur...

Newsletter: Share: