What is Big Think?  

We are Big Idea Hunters…

We live in a time of information abundance, which far too many of us see as information overload. With the sum total of human knowledge, past and present, at our fingertips, we’re faced with a crisis of attention: which ideas should we engage with, and why? Big Think is an evolving roadmap to the best thinking on the planet — the ideas that can help you think flexibly and act decisively in a multivariate world.

A word about Big Ideas and Themes — The architecture of Big Think

Big ideas are lenses for envisioning the future. Every article and video on bigthink.com and on our learning platforms is based on an emerging “big idea” that is significant, widely relevant, and actionable. We’re sifting the noise for the questions and insights that have the power to change all of our lives, for decades to come. For example, reverse-engineering is a big idea in that the concept is increasingly useful across multiple disciplines, from education to nanotechnology.

Themes are the seven broad umbrellas under which we organize the hundreds of big ideas that populate Big Think. They include New World Order, Earth and Beyond, 21st Century Living, Going Mental, Extreme Biology, Power and Influence, and Inventing the Future.

Big Think Features:

12,000+ Expert Videos


Browse videos featuring experts across a wide range of disciplines, from personal health to business leadership to neuroscience.

Watch videos

World Renowned Bloggers


Big Think’s contributors offer expert analysis of the big ideas behind the news.

Go to blogs

Big Think Edge


Big Think’s Edge learning platform for career mentorship and professional development provides engaging and actionable courses delivered by the people who are shaping our future.

Find out more

Re-Manufacturing: 60 Seconds with Niall Ferguson

June 22, 2013, 1:59 AM

Big Idea: Economic and Institutional Flexibility.  

Harvard historian Niall Ferguson discusses the idea of bringing manufacturing back home to the United States. He suggests that economics will make this shift in production attractive.

In terms of economics, US wages would either have to fall dramatically, eliminating Chinese arbitrage opportunities, or the US Dollar would have to weaken much more than it already has. Ferguson however portrays these as improbable, and also indicates that these are not the only important factors in relocation decisions. 

For Ferguson, not all parts of the US are attractive to investors, which poses a larger problem.  More often than not, companies will have to deal with trade unions, taxation laws, and a lot of red tape.  He believes that if the United States can be flexible and have an attractive market for manufacturing, then the movement back to the US becomes more feasible.

This attractive market includes an efficient legal system.  It is assumed that the US has a good legal system, with strong private property laws and rights.   However, when the rule of law is measured through corruption and criminality in business, along with the cost of litigation and the efficiency of courts, the US does not even fall in the top 30 countries.

Ferguson claims that manufacturing is not simply about whether it is cheaper to produce in the US or abroad, but about whether a specific location offers the right resources, and institutions, which includes the legal system. The US competitiveness score has decreased over the past five years, showing why nobody is in a rush to locate their businesses in the US.

Over the next couple of years, we will discover which one of these theories comes out on top.  Do institutions matter enough to keep production abroad? Or will there be a move back to US production because of economic reasons?




Re-Manufacturing: 60 Second...

Newsletter: Share: